Archive for the 'Movie Reviews' Category

29
Mar

Movie Review: Fitna

Title: Fitna
Release: 2008
Genre: Documentary
Run Time: 15 Minutes
Studio/Publisher: Geert Wilders
Rating: 20%

Geert Wilders, leader of the far-right Dutch Party for Freedom (PVV), released a bombshell in the form of Fitna – a self-proclaimed documentary and wake up call to Europe in the face of growing Islamicization. Arabic for “disagreement and division among people”, Fitna has caused much division among nations and even within the ranks of those critical to radical Islam. Kurt Westergaard, the Danish cartoonist whose bomb-laden depiction of Mohammed resulted in worldwide riots and death threats, publicly condemned Wilders’ use of his drawings due to the film’s sweeping indictment of Islam as a whole. Web host Network Solutions suspended film’s website and video streaming company LiveLeak hosted the movie for only two days. Pakistan briefly banned YouTube while Al Qaeda has issued a fatwa against the blonde instigator. Controversy, thy name is Geert.

Fitna The Movie (screenshot)

Information-wise, Fitna offers little new material to those who have spent much time studying radical Islam. The 15-minute presentation consists of gory footage spliced with inflammatory Muslim speeches and confrontational suras from the Qur’an. Some viewers will recognize footage originally seen in Islamist documentaries like Beneath the Veil and Cult of the Suicide Bomber. Other video includes of people jumping from the Twin Towers during the 9/11 attacks and neatly-edited clips of executions by Iraqi insurgents.

The soundtrack consists of passages from Edvard Greig’s brooding “Aase’s Death” and Tchaikovsky’s “Arabian Dance” looping intermittently between apocalyptic Muslim prayers. Much of the dialog is in Arabic so most viewers will rely on the [thankfully minimal] English/Dutch subtitles. There is no narration in the film per se but the violent speeches by Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and various Imams set the pace just as effectively.

The latter portion of the film pushes the immigration buttons familiar to Wilders’ PVV platform. Under the title “The Netherlands of the Future?”, a graphic slideshow displays images of gay/female executions, blood-smeared children and female circumcisions. This macabre presentation is followed by a series of inflammatory news headlines:
“We do not agree with freedom of speech, because we denounce democracy”
“Explosive increase honor killings in Amsterdam”
“School closes on muslim holidays”
“Jihad-lessons in elementary school”
“Foreign imams allowed in more quickly”
“Mosques under the spell of radical muslim group”
“Suicide commandos in the Netherlands”
“Hamas gathers in Rotterdam”
“Mosque: turning the Netherlands into a muslim state”

Fitna The Movie (screenshot)

Fitna closes with a short clip of a hand turning a page of the Koran. The image fades as the sound of a page tearing is heard. The implication is quickly followed by the message “The sound you just heard was a page being removed from the phone book. For it is not up to me, but to Muslims themselves to tear out the hateful verses from the Quran”. The film’s final message states that Muslim Europeans have no interest but to conquer the west and that Islamic ideology must be defeated by freedom-loving Europeans as Nazism and Communism were before it.

It shouldn’t even need to be said that Fitna is a hatchet job, plain and simple. Compressing 15 minutes of footage and inspiration from Islam’s violent minority and passing it off as the summation of a centuries-old religion that contains over a billion followers smacks of a “solution” in search of a problem. A structurally identical film could be made in the Islamic world about the invasion of Christian (re: coalition) warriors, splicing scenes of dead Iraqi citizens with violent passages in the old testament and assorted rants by Jerry Falwell. The facts presented would be “true”, but hardly representative of the entire Christian world.

Nontheless, such a film would stand as firm proof to Islamists about the need for Muslim forces to crush the Christian enemy. Fitna will appeal similarly to modern-day crusaders who have already convinced themselves of the necessity for a second Crusade.

Fitna The Movie (screenshot)

Offense is in the eye of the beholder, so it would be difficult for an outsider to say whether this film warrants the extreme outcry and calls for censorship – perhaps that’s a Westerner mindset. Stronger anti-Islamic sentiment has long existed on the pages of FrontPageMag or Little Green Footballs and to my knowledge neither of these online publications have been threatened.

Fitna preaches a drastic scenario to the converted and would likely fail to penetrate mainstream Western thought even if it were given wide release. Wilders’ political associations, combined with his decision to attack all of Islam rather than its extremist elements, will cost credibility among discerning audiences.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • e-mail
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Propeller
  • Facebook
  • Live
07
Feb

Movie Review: Loose Change - Final Cut

Title: Loose Change - Final Cut
Release: 2007
Genre: Documentary
Run Time: 129 Minutes
Publisher: Louder Than Words, LLC
Rating: 80%
URL: http://lc911finalcut.com/

Loose Change Final Cut represents a refreshing approach to the documentary film in that, like mature software, it has been conspicuously updated over several years. Filmmaker Dylan Avery released the original 9/11 documentary in 2005 and the film underwent a second revision (Loose Change Second Cut) before the third and final release. Film updates were spawned by expanded information as well as user feedback and creative tweaking.

Loose Change Final Cut

Chances are you’ve heard many 9/11 theories, spewed emphatically by the same kind of person who thinks the moon landing was faked and that Martians are watching us. No doubt this tin-foil crowd will enjoy Loose Change’s systematic dissection and indictment of the government’s flaccid response to 9/11. However, the movie goes beyond Bush-bashing to provide evidence supplying many post-9/11 questions that still haven’t been adequately addressed by public officials or commissions. Among them:

  • If an airplane hit the low-lying Pentagon, how did it manage to score a direct hit and not leave much debris larger than a color printer? How was this advanced maneuver accomplished by a hijacker pilot whose piloting skills were so poor that American flight instructors openly questioned the validity of his commercial license?
  • If Flight 93 really went down via internal scuffles between passengers and hijackers then how come the wreckage was spread out much further than similar plane crashes in recent history?
  • Why was the US government seemingly disinterested news of money wire transfers from high ranking Pakistani ISI members to alleged hijacker Mohammed Atta - even though these transfers took place just before the terrorist attacks?
  • How could America’s sophisticated air defense system, now known to engage in war games simulating attacks nearly identical to the 9/11 incidents, fail to intercept airborne threats four times in the same morning?

To address these questions, Loose Change presents a plethora of news clips, expert interviews, graphical recreations and witness testimony, convincingly challenging the “official” version of events that lead up to and succeeded the attack on the twin towers. The film typically stops short of pointing the finger exclusively at any one entity and instead leaves the evidence hanging for viewer debate, with the main exception being the Zeitgeist-like call to arms at the close of the film.

Loose Change Final Cut

Loose Change Final Cut has several powerful moments that give pause to even the strongest skeptic. About 2/3 the way through the film, discussion turns towards WTC tower #7, which collapsed several hours after the twin towers collapsed. WTC #7 contained offices for the IRS, SEC, Secret Service and most interestingly New York’s Office of Emergency Management Command Center (which is supposed to be bullet-proof, bomb proof, and self-generating when need be). A British film crew reported that the tower had also fallen, succumbing to what appeared to be superficial fires. However, the tower is clearly shown standing in the background as the female reporter continues to speak about its collapse. Apparently CNN and BBC made the same mistake …

While not entirely one-sided in its approach, Loose Change could have nonetheless benefited from more attention to contrary evidence and non-conspiratorial alternatives. For example, Avery uses collapse times to prove that the twin towers were felled by an explosion rather than the impact of a plane – the time-lapsed implosion of the towers is shown to be consistent with the free-fall that would result from a building demolition. This evidence is offered as a refutation of the theory that diesel fueled fires caused the tower’s tube-like structure to loosen and disintegrate. However, the film does not address the popular alternative theory that the collapse of a single floor started a domino effect that resulted in a disintegration that just happened to be consistent with the timing of a free fall. Imagine you are standing on the upper of two planks of wood, both suspended by concrete blocks. Chances are you will not go through the first plank with you are standing still. Now imagine yourself jumping up and down on the upper plank – you could crash through the wood, albeit a little slower than you would sink if you had no resistance; however, the combined weight of yourself plus the wooden plank would cause greater strain on a second plank of wood below the first plank, etc. In other words, the diesel fuel or impact could have caused 1 or 2 floors to collapse, with the increasing weight and velocity speeding up the collapse of the entire structure.

In any case, Loose Change Final Cut is effective as a catalyst to debate. Some of my (unwitting) test audience used the evidence presented to unleash their strongest condemnations against George W. Bush and his “imperial war”. Others were highly skeptical and offered unsolicited explanations backing the official versions of certain events. What my test subjects all had in common was a strong opinion and any filmmaker that can accomplish such with today’s increasingly desensitized moviegoers deserves a pat on the back.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • e-mail
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Propeller
  • Facebook
  • Live
28
Nov

Movie Review: Zeitgeist - The Movie

Title: Zeitgeist - The Movie
Release: 2007
Genre: Documentary
Run Time: 116 Minutes
Author: Peter Joseph
Rating: 68%
URL: http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/ (watch online)

After an excessively long introduction, Zeitgeist launches into a dissection of religion (titled “The Greatest Story Ever Told”), and by religion the film-makers mean Christianity. A brief summary of astrology gives way to a comparison of earlier Middle-Eastern mythologies to the mythology which predated all of them. Indeed there are many coincidences to between the Egyptian Sun God Horus and the central figures of later faiths:

  • Horus was born December 25th to the virgin Isis
  • He was adorned by three “kings” who followed an eastern star
  • He was deemed a prodigy at 12 and was baptized at the Age of 30
  • He traveled with 12 disciples and traveled around performing miracles like healing the sick and walking on water
  • His alternate names included “Lamb of God”, “The truth, the light”
  • He was betrayed, crucified, buried from the dead and rose three days later

Anyone who paid attention during Sunday school or at least made an effort to read a bible (a group encompassing fewer Christians that one would think) should be a bit uneasy, as the Story of Jesus Christ is nearly identical - only the names differ. Strangely (or perhaps not) the same general sequence of events can be found many other mythologies across the world. The film then attempts to link common attributes of these stories to astrological symbolism and does a fairly convincing job of it.

None of this information (or at least the discussion of its legitimacy) should be new to armchair theologians, but it was not initially clear why Christianity was singled out above all others for astrological plagiarism - it was not the first, last or worst offender among the emerging faiths. Eventually, the answer is provided - the Romans apparently invented the myth of Jesus Christ solely to exercise social and economic control over Europe. Never mind Karl Marx’s Opiate of the Masses attack - the Zeitgeist narrator directly refers to Christianity and similar faiths as “the fraud of the age”. Them be Fightin’ words.

Alas, Zeitgeist is a film about conspiracy theories - an emphatic diatribe of how small groups of shadowy figures conspire to control the masses.

Bush’s Brawn

The second part of the movie, titled “All the World’s a Stage”, attempts to prove that the US government plotted the 9/11 attacks in New York and contracted the dirty work to international resources. Provided evidence includes a mixture of the apparent “TV clips of witnesses describing a second explosion”, the questionable “government efforts to hide any conclusive evidence of a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon” and the perplexing “the demolition-like accuracy with which the buildings collapsed”. Again, the viewer is presented with a series of facts that are true or at least believable, some arousing anecdotes and a consequential induction that implicates shadowy powers.

If film-maker Peter Joseph can be credited for one thing, it’s flawlessly utilizing Dale Carnegie’s yes-yes technique to influence the viewer. Like any good conspiracy theorist, he starts with information that is true (yes #1), follows with information that is apparent enough to make the viewer question previous dogma (yes #2) and inserts his interpretation of what is driving those occurrences (in this case, that the US government intentionally detonated the twin towers). One major distinction between a conspiracy theory and a valid explanation is that conspiracy theories rarely work inversely as deduction. As a Math Professor of mine loved to recite, proving all poodles are dogs does not prove all dogs are poodles.

Hand in my Pocket

The third section is called “Don’t Mind The Men Behind The Curtain” and deals with disproportionate influence exercised by early banking tycoons like JP Morgan and John D Rockefeller. The stock market crash of 1929 is alleged to have been deliberately engineered by the “international bankers” to allow a large-scale cash grab and easy purchase of failed rivals. The 1933 American gold seizure, establishment of the US Federal Reserve and the major world wars of the 20th century are also attributed to the objectives of the international bankers, who stood to gain from the interest on loans made to both the state and consumers. These bankers are never clearly defined after the first generation of financial barons. More alarmingly, the Federal Income Tax is declared unconstitutional - a declaration backed by a pair of former IRS agents who testify to avoiding tax payment for years without penalty. Perhaps they could share what they know with Wesley Snipes.

Zeitgeist closes, strangely, with a motivational speech about unity and how the human race should unshackle themselves from the social structures imposed by a diabolical few. It did provide levity for an otherwise bleak film, but nonetheless sounded kitschy.

Worth a Tin-Foil Hat?

Is Zeitgeist worth the watch? Probably, as you can watch it for free via the URL provided above. The movie also provides an opportunity to test your critical thinking - the real enjoyment in indulging conspiracy theories is not self-congratulation for being skeptical, but being able to explain precisely where they fail.

Conversely, you may find yourself occasionally saying “wait a minute!” and questioning what you thought you knew. Sadly, conspiracy theories are one of the few remaining outlets for some good old-fashioned, politically-incorrect debate, and one area Zeitgest excels at is stimulating debate. Invite a friend or two over and have fun.


Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • e-mail
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Propeller
  • Facebook
  • Live
04
Apr

Movie Review - The Last King of Scotland

Title: The Last King of Scotland
Release: 2006
Genre: Drama
Run Time: 121 Minutes
Studio/Publisher: Fox Searchlight
Rating: 75%

In the 1980s the World Wrestling Federation (WWF) featured a character by the name of Kamala the Ugandan Giant. Though the wrestler was in reality an American Black, he bore an uncanny resemblance to Idi Amin, the man who ruled Uganda as president from 1971 to 1979. I’m sure the likeness was no coincidence: the WWF probably thought that one of the world’s most notorious strongmen would serve as a good prototype for a wrestling “bad guy.” So it should come as no surprise that Idi Amin has emerged once again as the villain, this time in the film The Last King of Scotland.

The Last King of Scotland is based on the book of the same name by British author Giles Foden. Foden’s work is a historical novel; that is, it mixes fictional characters with real-life figures from history (some classic historical novels include Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace and Italian writer Alessandro Manzoni’s The Betrothed). Though the actor who plays Idi Amin, Forest Whitaker, is American, both director Kevin Macdonald and supporting actor James McAvoy are from Scotland .

The film tells the story of Idi Amin’s descent into totalitarianism, barbarism, and madness as seen through the eyes of Nick Garrigan, a young Scottish doctor who goes to Uganda on a humanitarian aid mission and ends up becoming the dictator’s personal physician (Garrigan, by the way, is Foden’s invention, though some have tried to link him with Robert Astles, an English soldier and associate of Idi Amin). At first Garrigan, like many Ugandans themselves, welcomes Amin and sees his rise to power as a means for Africans to assert their independence. He begins losing faith, however, after individuals accused of collaborating with Amin’s predecessor Milton Obote are brutally assaulted by police, buildings go up in smoke, and some of Amin’s associates suspected of treason disappear mysteriously. Amin’s paranoia, by definition, renders him irrational.

Continue reading ‘Movie Review - The Last King of Scotland’

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • e-mail
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Propeller
  • Facebook
  • Live
22
Feb

Movie Review: Cult of the Suicide Bomber

Title: The Cult of the Suicide Bomber
Release: 2005
Genre: Documentary
Run Time: 96 Minutes
Studio/Publisher: Disinformation
Rating: 90%

Former CIA agent Robert Baer narrowly missed becoming a statistic in 1983 when a car full of explosives was detonated near the American Embassy in Beirut. Since then, Baer has relentlessly studied the concept of suicide bombing and sought the mastermind behind the attack that cost him many colleagues, crisscrossing the Middle East in search of motives, tactical information and justification. The Cult of the Suicide bomber traces Middle Eastern suicide attacks to their Iranian origins, where 13 year old Hossein Fahmideh blew himself up on the front lines of the Iran-Iraq war. From there, Baer traces the evolution of suicide bombing from a military operation to an instrument of terror against civilians - predominantly Israelis, though the film opens with scenes from the London train bombing and ends with scenes from the sectarian violence between Sunni and Shia Muslims in Iraq.

The most impressive aspect of this documentary is just how deep into the suicide bombing cult Baer manages to delve. At one point, Baer is standing on the stage at a Tehran University during a lunchtime rally rife with chants of “Death to America”. Later, he sits -petrified- in the middle of a Hamas rally featuring pre-teen children marching with semi-automatic rifles. Baer speaks with leading Hezbollah commanders within plain view of Israeli border guards, speaks with those same border guards later and visits holy sites where attacks were executed by Muslim/Jewish extremists.
Continue reading ‘Movie Review: Cult of the Suicide Bomber’

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • e-mail
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Propeller
  • Facebook
  • Live
21
Feb

Movie Review: Grizzly Man

Title: Grizzly Man
Release: 2005
Genre: Documentary
Run Time: 103 Minutes
Studio/Publisher: Lions Gate
Rating: 85%

A couple of years ago my brother told me of a man who had lived among grizzly bears in Alaska and was later killed by one. This man had apparently thought that grizzlies could be tamed and taught not to attack humans. Evidently he was wrong. I then vaguely remembered seeing a magazine article with a photograph of a man standing face to face with a large bear. Though I didn’t connect the picture with my brother’s story at first, they came together for me with the recent release of the documentary Grizzly Man.

The title character of the film refers to Timothy Treadwell, a self-described bear expert and freelance environmentalist who spent time with the grizzlies of Alaska’s Katmai National Park for thirteen summers in a row. In October 2003, he, along with his latest girlfriend Amie Huguenard, was fatally mauled by a hungry bear.

Directed and narrated by veteran German filmmaker Werner Herzog, Grizzly Man includes footage Treadwell took of himself, the park, and the animals there - mostly bears, but foxes too - as well as interviews with people who knew him, such as his parents, an ex-girlfriend, and friends of both sexes. There is even a clip of Treadwell being interviewed by David Letterman.

The scenes from Katmai Park are so breathtakingly beautiful that it is almost worth seeing the movie just for them. The bears are another story. When the first shot of Treadwell standing unarmed (he never took bear spray, let alone weapons, on his visits) in the middle of the park with the bears came on, I felt scared, as if it were me there. I then relaxed, though, on watching him get up close to the bears, talk to them, and touch their noses. He treats the foxes almost like dogs: he pets them, has them lie at his feet and so on. The fox cubs pictured are adorable. Grizzly Man is obviously a fascinating film for people interested in wildlife.

We also learn about Tim Treadwell’s life. He was born in New Jersey to a middle-class American family. His parents describe his childhood as normal. They note he always loved animals. Though he received a swimming scholarship to a college, he eventually dropped out of school and moved to Malibu, California.

A darker side of Treadwell later emerges, however. After trying out but failing to get the role of the bartender in the TV series Cheers [note: some sources say Treadwell’s claim to have auditioned for Cheers was not true; see my note on his habit of stretching the truth], he went on a downward spiral. He began drinking excessively, taking drugs, and became very depressed. A former girlfriend of his mentions that he fell in with dangerous people. He also refused the medication his doctor prescribed for depression.
Nevertheless, Treadwell managed to overcome his alcoholism and drug addiction. He made a promise to the bears that he would give up drinking and devote his life to them, and so began his journey to Alaska every summer for the next thirteen years.
Continue reading ‘Movie Review: Grizzly Man’

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • e-mail
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Propeller
  • Facebook
  • Live



Further Research