Paternity testing all children at birth might not worth it because the fact that at most 4% of men are not the genetic fathers of the children they are raising would not justify the huge of testing. Rather, in my essay “Fatherhood Rescinded” (on this site) that men who discover they are not the fathers of their “children” should be absolved of any duty to financially support them unless they requested to do so themselves.

Emilia

how much do you pay your shrink?

I’d ask for money back.

“family” courts are nothing but the front for criminal fraternity of divorce industry specialising in asset stripping and destruction of family. Contact with the child/ren even though is proven beyond any doubt that it is the most beneficial influence for child development and safety in child’s life, is more often than not railroaded by the mother and even when court orders are flaunted there are no reprisals. Invented allegations of abuse, fear and lot more are also used with impunity as delaying tactics in denial of contact. In many cases, without any evidence of father ever doing anything wrong, contact is granted only for couple of hours – supervised. What do you think that must seem like to the children? all the denigration of their father they hear “at home” must be true if system is so worried about their safety. Right?
Wake up to the truth people. You are not mushrooms so don’t let powers that be feed you bullshit.
I have not seen my children for almost nine years now. not because I do not want to but because of the corrupt system. I have been on 63 day hunger strike to highlight the problen and there is a gagging order issued against me telling the truth. And, for last six years I live in exile, because my life was threatened in UK. Google me.

Len Miskulin
Chairman
Live Beat Dads UK

Argument that duped man should just grin and bear it and keep being financial slave to, as is usual in most cases, not financially support children but keep the slut in “life style she is acustomed to”, is the very pointer to most of the wrongs in our society. You ladies and gentlemen daily walk on the roads. OK, so you enjoyed years of using one particular walk and then you are told that you are prohibited using it BUT you must fully mantain the cost of upkeep. Would you not complain? Most of the cases challenging paternity are beyond “father” and child bond issue because mother has already done everything possible to destroy that bond by denying contact (even when approved by the courts) and alienating the child. All she is really interested in is his money.

It goes further still. If the man was sole provider and she was kept woman, having child/ren by somebody else is act of fraudulent entrapment through deceit. He might have, if it was not for her deceit, left her and spent his money to better his own life. However you look at it she is a liar, fraudster and freeloader.

Man who is paying child support gets remarried and has his own children. His children suffer financially because quite a part of his earnings go to the Cuckoo and her kids. Therefore his is bound to years of involuntary servitude (slavery) which affects him and his family.

DNA testing at birth would eliminate most of the probelms but there must also be opportunity for restitution and punisment which will fit the crime. Anything else is just encouraging further deceit and destruction of innocent children and men.

First, where are the morals at with these woman. If you were stupid enough to spread your legs and not use protection, you should have at least had enough marbles to not bring a child into this world that you dont know who the father is. The real key is to stop sleeping around. Men have been sleeping around for years and what are you gonna do, nothing. Woman have taken on more and more of the man’s roles and I guess sleeping around was naturally going to come up.

Second, if you have raised a child for the majority of their childhood and then find out that it is not your child, I can understand how frustrating that would be. If you have raised a child for 10 plus years, how could you willingly turn your back on that child… no matter what. At that point you have already developed a bond. It is irresponsible on the fathers part to walk away. Two wrongs dont make a right… never have… never will. It is not the child’s fault that their mom was sleeping around. As a father, biological or not, dont make that child another statistic of a fatherless child when you have been the father for thier life up to that point.

I dont agree that the father should have to legally support a child that is not his, but morally stand up. If the father had an idea years earlier, he should have acted on it and had a paternity test done then. You would have avoided a lot of mess.

The other option is to move to Tennesee where they are trying to pass a law that every child born has to have a paternity test done before any man can be listed on the birth certificate.

Good luck!