Archive for December, 2008

22
Dec

The Christmas Tree Conundrum

Two years ago a judge in Toronto , Ontario , Canada caused a stir by ordering the removal of a Christmas tree from the lobby of a courthouse. She reasoned that as a Christian religious symbol, the tree would alienate non-Christians who happened to pass by the lobby. A controversy immediately ensued. Predictably, conservative Christians spoke darkly of a “war against Christmas” and against Christianity in general. The Canadian Muslim Congress called the judge’s decision “stupid” (agreement on my part here). Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said that the key to making people of all faiths feel welcome in the province was not to suppress one religious holiday but to celebrate all of them. Finally, Dr. Robert Buckman, president of the Humanist Association of Canada, entered the fray by stating that the Christmas tree was not a religious symbol but a “secular symbol of a festival period.”

Of all the above-mentioned statements, I tend to concur with Dr. Buckman’s the most. The Christmas tree to my mind is not a symbol of Christianity or any other faith for that matter. As I researched the matter further, it struck me as ironic that while Russian-born journalist Cathy Young, a self-described Jewish agnostic, has written of always having a Christmas tree during the holidays, I as a practising Christian have never put one up in my own house. Nowhere in the Biblical accounts of Jesus’ birth is there any mention of an evergreen. More importantly, today publicly displayed Christmas trees are a common sight in a number of non-Christian nations, such as Japan and the United Arab Emirates (shortly after the courthouse controversy broke out, the National Post featured a picture of a Christmas tree at a shopping mall in Dubai ). The whole silly affair led me to a serious study of this innocent-looking plant that nonetheless possesses the potential for sowing discord.

Christmas TreeThe origins of the Christmas tree are shrouded in mystery, and many accounts on the subject are unsubstantiated at best and contradictory at worst. One legend has it that the custom began with Martin Luther. According to this story, Luther was walking through the bush on a winter night and saw stars in the sky above the pines. He then brought a pine home and decorated it to show his children what he had witnessed. Since it was Christmastime, he lit candles on it to mark Christ’s birth. However, even in pre-Christian times people in Northern Europe, including Germany , celebrated the winter solstice by placing candles on trees and mistletoe on their doors to ward off evil spirits. After their conversion to Christianity, Northern Europeans incorporated these pagan traditions into their Christmas festivities. My Norwegian ancestors, for example, would gather around the Christmas tree, light candles on it, and sing carols (thankfully no record of any accidents!).

Following the Reformation, some Protestants, in particular the Puritans, opposed the Christmas tree on the grounds it was “heathen,” which in a sense it was. Puritan leader Oliver Cromwell banned the tree, along with other Christmas paraphernalia, for this reason when he ruled England in the 1640s. (The fact that the Christmas tree was already around in Britain at that time goes against the view that it was only introduced to that country when Queen Victoria married the German Prince Albert in the 1800s.)

When they migrated to the United States , the Puritans brought their mistrust of the Christmas tree with them. Another source of their opposition was the notion that the tree was “Popish,” a derogatory term for Roman Catholic. The Puritans, after all, wanted to “purify” the Protestant church of any Catholic influence, and they felt the Anglicans, who continued to observe Christmas, did not go far enough in this direction. By the late 19th century, though, Christmas celebrations, together with the tree, came into vogue in the US and hence became part of the commercialism we see today surrounding the holiday in that country.

Ironically, the other diehard opponents of the Christmas tree besides the Puritan religious zealots were the equally fanatical militant atheists of Communist Russia.* In their quest to eradicate religion from society, they attempted to ban the Christmas tree in the Soviet Union . The tree was such an ingrained tradition, however, that the Communists ended up making the best out of a bad situation and allowing it to be put up under the name of “New Year’s tree.”

The other great irony is that despite the depiction of the Christmas tree as “Popish,” until recently it was never a traditional part of predominantly Catholic Southern Europe. My father, for instance, who grew up in Italy , said as a child that no one he knew ever put up such a tree. The main Christmas feature in Italian homes at the time was the nativity scene, the “presepio,” with Jesus, Mary, Joseph and the animals. However, the Christmas tree gradually found its way into Italy with the Americanization of that country in the 1950s. I’m sure the film “It’s a Wonderful Life,” which was in fact directed by an Italian American, Frank Capra, didn’t hurt! Now even the Vatican has a huge Christmas tree in front of St. Peter’s Basilica.

So the next time you see a Christmas tree – remember that in spite of all it has gone through it has still managed to be here with us here today! Merry Christmas.

* Note: not all atheists are militant, and not all religious individuals are zealots. Fanaticism can unfortunately be found within every belief system.

Sphere: Related Content

21
Dec

Challenges of Internet Security – Your Best Weapons (Part 2)

(See also: Part 1)

Online computer hacking has evolved from harmless pranks to big business: gangs of data thieves operate from Russia and China with near impunity. Tens of thousands of stolen credit card numbers are offered for sale on a weekly basis with a single card number selling for as little as $0.40. Home computer users have been overwhelmed by a continuous stream of viruses, trojans, spam, spyware and adware that threaten to introduce unwanted data or steal sensitive data – all while slowing PC’s to a crawl.

A cottage industry has developed for computer “experts” who promise to clean and tune-up home computers for prices ranging between $35 and $100 per treatment. Many of these would-be entrepreneurs are using software tools (often free to download) that can be installed and operated by the average user.

In the second of a two part series, we will look at two more indispensable tools for securing your computer or home network. While this series is geared towards internet security, most of the tools described are useful even on machines with no internet access.

Weapon #3 – Spyware Remover

Definition

Spyware refers to software installed without the user’s direct and informed consent. Once installed, spyware can collect personal / behavioural information, change computer settings, redirect browser activity, deliver unwanted advertising or even download other malicious software. The main difference between spyware and a virus is that spyware does not self-replicate – rather, it is typically installed as part of a legitimate software package (e.g. ad-supported software) or acquired after visiting an infected website that forces the web browser to automate the spyware download. Some of the more infamous spyware includes Zango, HuntBar and Gator Software.

Spyware removal software works similar to antivirus software by scanning the computer for traces of known spyware then attempting to remove the spyware.

Benefits

Spyware consumes disk space, memory and other computer resources in addition to being a nuisance to the user. Removing spyware regains these resources and improves computer performance.

Costs and Risks

Spyware removal software also uses a lot of system resources and must be updated regularly to keep up with advancing spyware technologies. Many so-called Spyware removal tools have proven to be fakes which themselves install spyware (e.g. Spyshredder, Pest Trap, MacSweeper).

Recommended Software

Lavasoft is considered by many to be the original anti-spyware company. Their flagship product, Ad-Aware, comes in several flavours ranging from a freeware disk scanner to a commercial version that scans in real-time and integrates antivirus protection. Spybot – Search and Destroy is another popular tool while the tech-saavy have shown increasing interest in the heuristic methods of Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware.

Weapon #4 – Registry / Disk Cleaner

Definition

Registry cleaners attempt to scan and repair Windows’ system registry by removing outdated entries and fixing invalid references. Registry software is particularly useful for removing orphaned entries caused by uninstalling software. Some packages also defragment the registry for improved performance. Disk Cleaners can remove traces of internet activity, program history and windows temporary files.

Benefits

Fixing registry errors can correct system problems that cause Windows to malfunction or stop working. Removing temporary internet files (e.g. cached files, cookies) not only saves disk space but improves security by removing traces of web site activity and any accompanying passwords.

Costs and Risks

Fixing registry errors incorrectly can also cause Windows to malfunction or stop working (good packages allow the user to make a registry backup before making changes). Some users find the removal of web browsing history to be inconvenient.

Recommended Software

Webroot’s Window Washer is the most popular commercial disk cleaner and is constantly updated with plug-ins to remove program traces from the latest software. CCleaner is a freeware alternative that lacks WW’s government-strength disk erasing but adds basic registry cleaning. Registry Mechanic comprehensively cleans, repairs and optimizes the Windows registry.

Sphere: Related Content

16
Dec

The Christmas Story

“Now Christmas is here,” go the lyrics of a popular song, “the most wonderful day of the year.” But how much do people really know about this wonderful day? Looking at the history of Christmas, we may discover things about the holiday which might surprise us.

Nativity SceneFirst of all, most scholars do not believe Jesus was actually born on December 25. According to Luke, the night Jesus was born “there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock” (Luke 2:8). December in Palestine and other Mediterranean regions falls in the rainy season, so shepherds do not let their animals outside at night during this time. Therefore Christ’s birth probably did not occur in December.

Christmas was not celebrated for the first four centuries after Jesus’ death. Not until Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire in 380 AD was Christmas established as a holiday. December 25 was chosen as the date of Christ’s birth for the Western church. This day coincided with the Roman feast of Saturnalia, so converts did not have to feel that becoming a Christian meant an end to fun and games. Many Eastern Orthodox churches, though, go by the Julian rather than Gregorian calendar and observe Christmas at the beginning of January.

Christmas Stocking StuffersFollowing the Reformation, the various Protestant denominations took different approaches to Christmas. The Lutheran and Anglican churches continued to celebrate it. On the other hand, the Calvinistic faiths – Presbyterians, Puritans and so on – condemned the holiday as “Popish” (a derogatory term for Roman Catholic). Puritan leader Oliver Cromwell, for example, banned Christmas celebrations upon coming to power in England in the 1640s, though they were resumed when the British monarchy, whose members were Anglican, was restored. Interestingly, while most of us regard Christmas in the United States as an orgy of commercialism, due to the country’s Puritan roots the holiday was not officially recognized there until the late 1800s. Likewise, Christmas was not observed by Presbyterians in Scotland until after the Second World War.

Today Christmas is a legal holiday in virtually all Christian nations as well as many Islamic ones (while Muslims do not consider Jesus the Son of God, they honour him as a prophet). In addition, in recent years people in East Asian nations, like Japan, have begun to adopt some non-religious aspects of Christmas, such as exchanging gifts and Christmas cards.

The traditionally Christian countries have through the centuries developed their own customs to mark the holiday. My Norwegian relatives, for instance, would gather around the Christmas tree, light candles on it, and sing carols (that the house never went up in flames in the process seems like a minor miracle, though in those days perhaps people were more careful with candles). They also served lutefisk (dried cod), romegrot (a type of pudding), and cookies with cream inside them at dinner.

So have a Merry Christmas… but remember how the holiday got here!

Sphere: Related Content

08
Dec

Book Review: Love-Ability

Book Cover for \Author: Madeline Pecora Nugent, Julian Stead
Publisher: New City Press
Release: 2007
Genre: Self-Help
Length: 176 pages
Rating: 85%

How do you become a better parent? A better husband/wife/partner? A better friend? A better neighbour? Most books, especially those tinged with a “New Age” approach, focus on what you can do for yourSELF. Now a new book asking those same questions has come out, but with a twist: to paraphrase JFK, “Ask not what others can do for you – ask what you can do for others.” Such is the message of Love-Ability: Becoming Lovable by Caring for Yourself and Others.

The book is written by Madeline Pecora Nugent, a married mother of five and Minister General for the Confraternity of Penitents, and Julian Stead, O.S.B., a Benedictine monk and priest at St. Gregory’s Abbey in Portsmouth , Rhode Island . Though the two obviously come from very different walks of life, their diametrically opposed personal experiences complement each other and underline the book’s relevance for all readers no matter what their gender, marital status, or station in life.

Despite the authors’ differences, Love-Ability is written from a Christian, and more specifically Catholic, perspective. Quotes from Scriptures and prominent saints – in particular sixth-century Pope Gregory the Great – appear throughout it. However, the authors also include Buddhist maxims and references to the Islamic faith, so if one is willing to overlook the Christian references the book has a message that can be heard by all.

The main point of Love-Ability is that if you put others before yourself, you end up not only helping them but gaining something for yourself as well. In other words, “givers are receivers.” Placing oneself last involves both concrete acts such as volunteering or making charitable donations or even on a more abstract caring for the environment and less tangible measures like paying attention to one’s manners or being careful before attributing bad intents to other people’s actions (for instance, if your friend seemed to snub you at the store, he or she might have been too occupied to notice you).

Nonetheless, there is a “good” kind of giving and a “not so good” kind. We should not look down on those to whom we make charitable donations. It is similarly wrong to selectively give to those we view as more “worthy” of our kindness. Love-Ability cites the case of a woman who refused to donate to AIDS foundations because she considered people with that disease “sinners.” We must in addition examine whether the motives for our generosity are sound. For example, believing that if we perform good deeds we can make up for past wrongs we have committed is misguided. The authors explain that “righteousness cannot be bought.”

On the other hand, putting others first doesn’t mean being a doormat. The authors tell readers to “splurge” on themselves from time to time and do something enjoyable with it. This is protective against becoming a miser. In addition, they warn that in the long run it is better not to pretend to agree with somebody if you in reality disagree with him or her. In other words, your opinion counts too. And don’t expect to take on every responsibility thrust on you; at worst this can lead to making promises one cannot keep, another mistake to avoid.

The final chapter of the book advises readers who feel they need professional help what to look for in a counsellor (who could be not only a counsellor per se but a physician, member of the clergy, etcetera). All in all, no matter whether or not we are actively seeking to become more “lovable,” Love-Ability is a book that is worth reading.

To find out about ordering the book, go to www.love-ability.com.

Sphere: Related Content




Further Research


RSSQuick Shots




Categories


Archives