<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cohabitation: The Final Frontier?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/</link>
	<description>Dissecting What You Choose to Ignore</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emilia Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-33138</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilia Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-33138</guid>
		<description>Dear lh,

Thank you for your comment.  Sorry to have gotten back to you so late; I didn't think I would get any more comments on my articles!

I understand what you are saying in your post about cohabitation per se leading to a higher divorce rate among cohabitors who do marry.  However, I believe scientific studies show it's not so much the cohabitation per se that leads to these higher divorce rates but the fact that cohabitors are less traditional in general than those who went into marriage directly and thus more open to divorce.  Still, I agree that maybe the two partners in a cohabiting relationship should clear what their intentions are before moving in together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Dear lh,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment.  Sorry to have gotten back to you so late; I didn&#8217;t think I would get any more comments on my articles!</p>
<p>I understand what you are saying in your post about cohabitation per se leading to a higher divorce rate among cohabitors who do marry.  However, I believe scientific studies show it&#8217;s not so much the cohabitation per se that leads to these higher divorce rates but the fact that cohabitors are less traditional in general than those who went into marriage directly and thus more open to divorce.  Still, I agree that maybe the two partners in a cohabiting relationship should clear what their intentions are before moving in together.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lh</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-31681</link>
		<dc:creator>lh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-31681</guid>
		<description>As mentioned, stats show that marriages that follow cohabitation break up more often that marriages that were not preceded by cohabitation. Why?? Some expectations about cohabitation are not reality based. Just because you're living in, doesn't mean that your partner will be open with you. Cohabiting may provide a false sense of security during what should be a phase of "courtship" when both parties' should be more skeptical. Moving out is a bigger adjustment than slowing down a dating relationship, so cohabiting people may be less likely to draw away and may drift into a marriage that is no longer a conscious choice. If dating you are likely to find a new partner more easier than if you are cohabiting.  Sometimes cohabiting partners have different beliefs about cohabitation, for example one partner thinks it is a trial marriage and the other thinks it is a convenient relationship until they are ready for marriage. Values and habits might be indications of what a longer marriage will  be like, better than depending on behavior during a period of cohabitation. A partner who overwhelms by debate points (it's practical) or subtle name calling (everyone does it) in an attempt to persuade you to cohabit, does not understand jointly beneficial decision making that is part of many long term relationships. Some people are not emotionally suited to the long periods of relationship instability that are part of cohabitation. Where is the research that compares the pre-marriage relationships of those whose marriages last and those whose marriages don't? Or are research results just too politically incorrect to talk about? Each person should have the information to make an informed choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">As mentioned, stats show that marriages that follow cohabitation break up more often that marriages that were not preceded by cohabitation. Why?? Some expectations about cohabitation are not reality based. Just because you&#8217;re living in, doesn&#8217;t mean that your partner will be open with you. Cohabiting may provide a false sense of security during what should be a phase of &#8220;courtship&#8221; when both parties&#8217; should be more skeptical. Moving out is a bigger adjustment than slowing down a dating relationship, so cohabiting people may be less likely to draw away and may drift into a marriage that is no longer a conscious choice. If dating you are likely to find a new partner more easier than if you are cohabiting.  Sometimes cohabiting partners have different beliefs about cohabitation, for example one partner thinks it is a trial marriage and the other thinks it is a convenient relationship until they are ready for marriage. Values and habits might be indications of what a longer marriage will  be like, better than depending on behavior during a period of cohabitation. A partner who overwhelms by debate points (it&#8217;s practical) or subtle name calling (everyone does it) in an attempt to persuade you to cohabit, does not understand jointly beneficial decision making that is part of many long term relationships. Some people are not emotionally suited to the long periods of relationship instability that are part of cohabitation. Where is the research that compares the pre-marriage relationships of those whose marriages last and those whose marriages don&#8217;t? Or are research results just too politically incorrect to talk about? Each person should have the information to make an informed choice.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilia Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-27178</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilia Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-27178</guid>
		<description>Dear Asnath,

Thank you.  If you could send me your research paper at emilia_e_murphy@yahoo.ca, I would be pleased to read it.

Emilia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Dear Asnath,</p>
<p>Thank you.  If you could send me your research paper at <a href="mailto:emilia_e_murphy@yahoo.ca">emilia_e_murphy@yahoo.ca</a>, I would be pleased to read it.</p>
<p>Emilia</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asnath msaaki</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-27173</link>
		<dc:creator>asnath msaaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-27173</guid>
		<description>i have gone through it,its very helpfuly in my research paper,congrats for the one who wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">i have gone through it,its very helpfuly in my research paper,congrats for the one who wrote.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynics Unlimited &#187; Does Canadian Taxation Discriminate Against Marriage?</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-22987</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynics Unlimited &#187; Does Canadian Taxation Discriminate Against Marriage?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-22987</guid>
		<description>[...] Cynics Unlimited: &#8220;Cohabitation - The Final Frontier&#8221;? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">[...] Cynics Unlimited: &#8220;Cohabitation - The Final Frontier&#8221;? [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venu</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-13212</link>
		<dc:creator>Venu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-13212</guid>
		<description>Hi All,
This is venu.
I have gone through this site and i found that this site was provides the information about the divorce and it's related to family law and marriages.
 &lt;a href="http://divorcelawyers.com/divorce_tips.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;divorce society&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Hi All,<br />
This is venu.<br />
I have gone through this site and i found that this site was provides the information about the divorce and it&#8217;s related to family law and marriages.<br />
 <a href="http://divorcelawyers.com/divorce_tips.asp" rel="nofollow">divorce society</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samitha</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-11472</link>
		<dc:creator>samitha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-11472</guid>
		<description>This site deals with the divorce lawyers related to thoughts on divorce cases and greater risk of divorce if the relationship eventually leads to marriage, more domestic violence,actually reduced the chance of divorce by acting as a â€œfilterâ€ whereby future spouses could discover whether or not they were compatible.
&lt;a href="http://www.divorcelawyers.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;divorce thoughts&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">This site deals with the divorce lawyers related to thoughts on divorce cases and greater risk of divorce if the relationship eventually leads to marriage, more domestic violence,actually reduced the chance of divorce by acting as a â€œfilterâ€ whereby future spouses could discover whether or not they were compatible.<br />
<a href="http://www.divorcelawyers.com" rel="nofollow">divorce thoughts</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack&#8217;s Newswatch</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-8243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack&#8217;s Newswatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/02/17/cohabitation-the-final-frontier/#comment-8243</guid>
		<description>[...] Same-sex marriage is a burning issue in Canada and many other nations. In this country, it has been the subject of magazine and newspaper articles, radio and television shows, books, and, most recently, a debate in federal parliament in which members were called to vote on a motion to introduce legislation defining marriage as exclusively between a man and woman. The majority of members voted against the motion, so Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper stated that the debate was closed and would not be re-opened. Gay marriage is thus the â€œlaw of the land,â€ in the words of one website. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">[...] Same-sex marriage is a burning issue in Canada and many other nations. In this country, it has been the subject of magazine and newspaper articles, radio and television shows, books, and, most recently, a debate in federal parliament in which members were called to vote on a motion to introduce legislation defining marriage as exclusively between a man and woman. The majority of members voted against the motion, so Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper stated that the debate was closed and would not be re-opened. Gay marriage is thus the â€œlaw of the land,â€ in the words of one website. [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
