A Saskatchewan jury has returned a guilty verdict in the high-profile trial of Kim Walker:
A Saskatchewan man was found guilty Friday of second-degree murder in the death of his daughter’s drug-dealing boyfriend.
A Court of Queen’s Bench jury recommended the minimum sentence, life in prison with first eligibility for parole in 10 years, for Kim Walker in the death of James Hayward, 24, on March 17, 2003.
…
Walker was charged with first-degree murder in Hayward’s death.
He bled to death in the front room of his house after being shot five times by Walker, once in the back at close range.
Walker testified he didn’t remember the shooting.
Initial public sympathy has been on the side of Walker for reasons that should be obvious to all. A dedicated parent will go to amazing lengths to protect his/her child, particularly when (s)he perceives the child is being preyed upon. To Walker’s credit, he initially tried to save his daughter using standard legal means – most notably obtaining a warrant forcing his daughter into 72 hours of rehab. Unfortunately, Jadah came out of rehab and went right back into the arms of her boyfriend/dealer. Walker’s frustration is understandable, given he had to work within a legal system more likely to arrest HIM for physically intervening in his daughters decisions (e.g. “child abuseâ€) than punish the man helping to perpetuate her habit. Perhaps, as Walker’s testimony implied, the shooting of James Hayward was a blackout – a moment of frustration where the most extreme response seemed to be the only appropriate response.
However, tempting as it may be to whole-heartedly endorse Walker’s tough love, the shooting was still not justified and the circumstances do not warrant any kind of reduced/suspended sentence
- The shooting took place in James Hayward’s home. Walker was an invader which rules out any credible self-defense theory
- Jadah was a willing participant in her drug habit, and clearly chose to be with James Hayward. She went directly to Hayward’s house after being released from rehab and resumed her habit.
- There was no guarantee that Jadah would have stopped (or will continue to cease) her drug habit just because Hayward was no longer in the picture. There are other drug dealers in Saskatchewan and where there’s a will there’s surely a way to find more drugs. This fact mitigates the argument that eliminating Hayward was necessarily a matter of life and death for Jadah.
For this reason a second degree murder conviction is justified. Although many pundits will probably scream about how unfair the system is to protective parents, the jury obviously took Walker’s state of mind into account when deciding to convict on a lesser offense than the original first degree murder charge. Justice was served in this case, although both the Walkers and the Haywards lost in the end.

Recent Comments