16
Jul
06

Peace Without Parity

Do combatants in the middle east want peace?

As the violence in the middle east flares up once again, pundits and the public are intensifying the war of words over who is the blame for the cycle of violence. The only thing that most people can agree on is that, despite the indisputable human rights offenses on both sides, there is 1 side that is definitely in the right and justified in their uncivil response. For years I’ve battled both Pro-Arab and Pro-Israeli types who did not take kindly to the suggestion that their respective sides have no interest in peace.

But what is peace? When many people (myself included) speak of peace, we envision one more more identifiable groups/individuals coexisting harmoniously. Conflicts are resolved with words rather than guns. A mutual respect exists between all parties, as their special beliefs are secondary to some common principle that governs all groups. As the following quotations demonstrate, this westernized and romanticized view of peace can be the furthest thing from the minds of Arabs and Israelis alike:

Alleged Quotes from Arab/Muslim Leadership:

“Peace for us means the destruction of Israel. We are preparing for an all-out war, a war which will last for generations.”
–Yasser Arafat, El Mundo, Caracas, Venezuela, February 11 1980

“We may lose or win [tactically] but our eyes will continue to aspire to the strategic goal, namely, to Palestine from the river (i.e. Jordan) to the sea (i.e. the Mediterranean). Whatever we get now cannot make us forget this supreme truth.”
–Faisal Husseini, PA Minister of Jerusalem Affairs, Al-Safir (Lebanon), March 21 2001

“Hamas still wants Palestine from the river to the sea — and believes in retaking the land from Jordan to the Mediterranean, including Israel”
–Yasser Mansour, Hamas candidate from Nablus, The Boston Globe, 17 January 2006

“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.”
–Covenant of the Hamas, Preamble, 1988

Alleged Quotes from Israeli/Jewish Leadership:

“We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.”
– David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.

“Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves… The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country.”
– David Ben Gurion, quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky’s Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan’s “Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech.

“Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories.”
– Benyamin Netanyahu, then Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister, former Prime Minister of Israel, speaking to students at Bar Ilan University, from the Israeli journal Hotam, November 24, 1989.

“It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonialization, or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands.”
– Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, November 15, 1998.

All of these quotes can be found from various sources on the web and in many cases have proper citation. Some of the speakers cited have at least publicly moderated their views but continued to support movements that operate on the same sentiment.

So let’s revisit the question – do combatants in the middle east want peace? The answer could actually be yes, since peace can by definition mean the absence of civil disturbance. For Hamas, Hezbollah and other militants stationed in Gaza / Lebanon, peace might mean 6.5 million Israelis swimming in the Dead Sea and the remaining population held under oppressive Islamic rule. For Israeli expansionists, peace could mean Palestinians displaced and under severe lock down similar to the apartheid enforced by one-time Israeli ally South Africa. Both scenarios would constitute genocide or a level of oppression that the West finds unacceptable; however both extreme outcomes would be “peaceful”. Obviously there will be peace if foes are completely subjugated or eliminated outright.

Sphere: Related Content

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

6 Responses to “Peace Without Parity”


  1. 1 medvegonok Jul 17th, 2006 at 12:16 am

    > If Israel loses, lots and lots and lots of people are gonna die.
    > If Israel wins, lots and lots and lots of people are gonna die.
    > Welcome to War! It’s more fucking useless than you could have ever imagined!

    I would prefere the second scenarion, but what the “fucking useless”…

  2. 2 Esther Sep 16th, 2006 at 5:39 pm

    Check out this Web site: parityforpeace.org (or parityforpeace.com). Parity for Peace is a novel peace plan that enables both the Palestinians and the Israelis to have their state be on all the land “from the river (Jordan) to the sea (Mediterranean)” within a political framework that protects the rights of all. This plan should be considered as an alternative to the conventional two-state solution that leaves many people unsatisfied. No plan is perfect, of course, but consideration of this plan might help to clarify what is most important to the parties involved.

  3. 3 Molly Sep 16th, 2006 at 5:58 pm

    Thanks for your compilation of quotes from both sides. I’m printing them for reference when one side accuses the other of not wanting peace.

  4. 4 Jeremy Feb 5th, 2007 at 4:08 pm

    Secretary of State Madeleine Albright has said that during her current Middle East visit she would pressure the Palestinians to get tougher on terrorism, and also, if possible, suggest to Benjamin Netanyahu that he might do more to abide by the commitments made by his predecessors. But this is tragically to continue down the incredibly misleading path known as the Oslo peace process.

  5. 5 Thomas Feb 27th, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    The foreign ministers of the three giants of the Asian landmass Russia, China and India meet today in New Delhi on what will, hopefully, lead to a trilateral global alliance promoting international peace, prosperity and parity.

    Much work remains to make this dream a reality. But the progress made in the past three years leads to optimism that within the next six years, at most, a framework agreement will be signed formalizing this major partnership.

  1. 1 Psychopolitik » More on the latest mess… Pingback on Jul 17th, 2006 at 3:29 pm

Leave a Reply

Captcha
Enter the letters you see above.




Further Research


RSSQuick Shots




Categories


Archives